The COVID Backyard Shootout: Pellet vs steel BB vs Airsoft

I have been doing more shooting than usual lately, mainly as a way of spending time during COVID lockdown. Punching holes through bits of card in my back garden is not only fun, it’s now also considered responsible behaviour that keeps me and others safe (at least, that’s what I have been telling my wife…). However, it also started me thinking: of the replicas I own, which is the best shooter?

Which then started me thinking about the different types of replica pistol I review here: pellet shooters, 4.5mm BB shooters and Airsoft replicas shooting 6mm plastic BBs. How do the three different types compare as shooters? You might assume that a pellet being shot through a rifled barrel is always going to be more accurate, but I’m not sure that’s necessarily true at the 6m range at which I shoot. I think a pellet will always be more accurate at longer range, but that may not be relevant for short-range backyard shooting. In some ways, you could argue that I’m comparing apples with oranges here – Airsoft and pellet shooting replicas are designed for different things, but I use them all to shoot at targets in my backyard, and it’s that experience I want to compare.

My home-made backyard target holder and pellet/BB catcher – it’s made out of an old drawer with the base reinforced with wood and thick, heavy-duty carpet tiles to absorb impact and reduce ricochets.

So, here you have it – the backyard shootout! I’m going to use three very different replicas – one pellet shooter, one steel BB shooter and an airsoft replica. Each has been chosen as an accurate shooter of its particular type. And here are the contenders…

Umarex Beretta PX4 Storm

This is a CO2 powered, blowback replica that is capable of shooting both .177” pellets and 4.5mm steel BBs. I have never seen the point of shooting BBs through a rifled barrel, so I’ll be using pellets with this one. This is the most powerful replica tested in this shootout and it flings BBs downrange at a healthy 350fps from a 4” rifled barrel. Now, if you have read my review of the Umarex PX4 (and you’ll find a link at the end of this article if you haven’t), you’ll know that, out of the box, mine was pretty dismal in terms of accuracy. However, with a couple of simple mods it has turned into a very satisfying shooter.

Gletcher PM 1951

This a CO2 powered, blowback replica of the iconic Makarov pistol. It shoots only 4.5mm steel BBs through a 3.15” smoothbore barrel and when I tested it, it gave a velocity of around 280fps. When I first used it, it consistently shot low and so I have reduced the height of the front sight to make it hit closer to the point of aim.

Tokyo Marui Glock 26

This is a Duster Gas (HFC 134a) -powered blowback replica that shoots 6mm BBs at a fairly lowly 210fps from a 2.95” barrel. This shot to the point of aim out of the box and hasn’t been modified in any way.

The Shooting Test

I’ll be shooting at targets from 6m, semi rested to reduce errors caused by my shooting (in)ability. For each replica type, I’ll shoot four targets with ten shots and I’ll keep only the highest scoring target for each type. A direct comparison will tell us which is my most accurate replica at this relatively short range.

I’ll be using standard Sportwaffen- Schneider card targets for each. The target is 14cm square, the outer circle measures 115mm in diameter and the inner black circle is 28mm. There are twelve scoring zones and points are awarded for the highest scoring area any shot is touching. The highest possible score for ten shots is 120 if all the shots are in or touching the innermost light circle which has a diameter of just 9mm. The replicas I’m using are all blowback and all have been reviewed here on the Pistol Place.

Umarex Beretta PX4

10 shots at 6m, semi-rested using RWS 0.53g training pellets. The score was:

2 x 8, 1 x 9, 1 x 10, 4 x 11, 2 x 12

Total: 103/120

I really enjoy shooting this replica now that it’s capable of decent accuracy. The blowback feels strong, it is loud enough without being a problem and it feels solid when you shoot it.

Gletcher PM1951

10 shots at 6m, semi-rested using Umarex steel 4.5mm BBs. The score was:

2 x 9, 2 x 10, 4 x 11, 2 x 12

Total: 106/120

I like the functional realism of this replica and the fact that it has the strongest blowback and that it’s the loudest here, though by a small margin over the PX4. I also like the fact that this is a hefty, solid-feeling replica.

TM Glock 26

10 shots at 6m, semi-rested using 0.25g BBs. The score was:

1 x 8, 1 x 9, 2 x 10, 4 x 11, 2 x 12    

I really love the tiny TM Glock 26 and this is probably my favourite Airsoft replica, just because it shoots so well, though I also appreciate that’s it’s a great functional and visual replica. However, shooting alongside the other two in this challenge, it is noticeable that it’s very quiet, quite light and that the blowback is the weakest of the three.  

Total: 105/120

So, the Gletcher PM1951 is the surprise winner in this backyard shooting test by a very small margin. It’s so close overall that, on another day, either one of the others might have edged ahead. What’s impressive for me isn’t just the winner but that all three were capable of shooting accurately enough for challenging and satisfying target work. If you were shooting at longer range (say, 10m), I suspect that the PX4 would do much better in comparison. However, 6m is all I have space for, so that’s what I’m using here.   


If you had to guess the winner here based on stats, you would probably choose the Umarex PX4, simply because it shoots pellets through a rifled barrel that’s longer than the barrel on either of the other two. I already knew how good the TM Glock is as 6m shooting and I would probably have guessed that the Gletcher PM1951 would have done worst of all in terms of accuracy. But here in the real backyard world, that’s just not how it works. The Gletcher PM 1951 and the TM Glock 26 are great target shooters at 6m, despite using BBs which you might expect to be less accurate. In isolation the TM Glock also feels like a convincing replica too but, in the company of these two CO2 powered blowback replicas with metal slides, it does feel just a little wimpy. The other two are heavier, louder and with stronger blowback and both replicate the firearm experience more closely than the Glock.

In the end, it all depends on what you’re looking for in a replica. For me, shooting ability is important – I don’t collect wall decorations; I like shooting my replicas and I want them to be accurate enough to make that fun and challenging. For that reason, I do very much like the TM Glock. However, the Umarex PX4 is almost as accurate and it’s louder, heavier and has stronger blowback compared to the Airsoft replica. With its extended grip, the Gletcher PM1951 looks a little odd to me, but it is a cracking shooter as well as a good functional replica…

So, there you are. The winner of my COVID Backyard Shootout is… Any of these replicas! They’re all fun to shoot, accurate enough to be challenging and those things help keep you shooting and off the streets in these difficult times. If I had to pick a personal favourite, it would probably be the Umarex PX4 – it may be marginally less accurate than the other two but I like the way it looks and shoots and it fits my hand really well.

Why not try this challenge yourself – only use air or Airsoft pistols that are replicas of real firearms, use as many different types as you can, shoot four targets with ten shots on each at your usual range and keep only the best score. Then compare to find your own backyard champion…

Stay Safe and Enjoy Your Shooting  

Related Posts

Umarex Beretta PX4 Storm Redux

Gletcher PM 1951 review

Tokyo Marui Glock 26 review

Shooting in Thailand

Pistol Place contributor AdrianBP lives in Thailand with his wife Gung. Adrian recently had the opportunity to try some cartridge pistols at his local shooting club. Here’s his story…

Khao Keaw Rifle Club, Nakhon Sawan

Last year Gung and I visited the Khao Keaw Rifle Club which is about ten kilometers south of the provincial city of Nakhon Sawan in Thailand. Last Wednesday we decided it was about time (after a rather hectic eighteen months) that we followed up on our initial enquiries and went along to join.

01-entrance - Copy

“Khao Kaew” means “Green Mountain” and already had a well established shooting range when Gung was a little girl. In fact her father, a Major in the Royal Thai Army, was a friend of the owner. Despite the name, it caters more for pistol than rifle shooting and is an extremely well organised and efficiently managed establishment. Lifetime membership may be purchased for THB 2,500 (about GBP 50) or annual membership at THB 500. A guest may be invited to shoot, if accompanied by a member, for a nominal fee. As a foreigner, I would need a Thai referee and Gung was able to act as such; my “Tabian Bahn” (house registration document) proved my place of residence in Thailand.

Shooting prices are also fair and guns may be rented from the club for approximately GBP 20 including 25 cartridges and three targets. Additional ammunition may be purchased as required at about THB 500 for 25 cartridges (depending on the gun). A choice of .38, 9mm and .45 calibre pistols are available. There is a shop where you can purchase shooting-related accessories such as holsters, gun-slips, cleaning consumables, T-shirts, car stickers etc. Once we had registered, we were allowed to enter the range proper which lies though an exceedingly pleasant partially covered garden courtyard with seating and refreshments for sale (no alcohol, of course).

02-entrance hall - Copy

Luck was with us as we were informed that on the coming Sunday (the day before yesterday) the club would be hosting a beginners pistol shooting and marksmanship course which we could attend if we wished. We duly agreed and although arriving a little late, were quickly signed-in and found a place to sit in the (rather full) lecture room.

The course was given by three instructors in turn and was exceptionally good. It commenced by explaining the three main kinds of (practical) pistol you are likely to come across, giving as examples a S&W Model 19 revolver, a Colt 1911A1 and a CZ-75.

Basic operation and safe handling were explained, as well as club rules for carrying pistols at the range. Different types of cartridges were shown explaining both the metric and imperial systems of measurement and that favourite of the British press, the fact that very similar “calibre” bullets could in fact belong to very different cartridges. This was illustrated by comparing a .22 rimfire (short) against a .223 Remington!

The five basic parts of pistol marksmanship were then described (grip, stance, breathing, trigger pull and follow-through) in a clear and concise fashion. Slide-shows and video clips were used throughout and even though it was of three hours duration, with only a brief coffee break, everyone was glued to what the instructors had to say. Around eighty people were present, of which about a third were ladies. Most people had their own guns and it was fascinating, especially for an enthusiast like me, to see such a variety of different pistols.

Following lunch it was time to “have a go” and shoot some targets. A score of sixty or more would result in the basic marksmanship award… needless to say, I was a bag of nerves! Bar some clay shooting a couple of years ago and some rough shooting as a lad, I have relatively little experience of shooting firearms and in fact it had been some five years since I had done any full bore pistol shooting in Thailand, with that limited to about 300 rounds through a very limited selection of guns (a Glock 19, Beretta 92, a couple of Colt 1911s and a couple of S&W revolvers).

However, no time like the present and so Gung pushed me over to register and borrow a gun. On the Wednesday I had already been asked which calibre I would like and had decided on a Colt .45… I was now having second thoughts. However, one of the instructors volunteered his Colt Government Series 70 and so laden with fifty rounds, three targets, an empty magazine ejected from the pistol and said Series 70 with the slide locked back, it was over to the range!

03-shotting stalls - Copy

I wrote my name on each target and waited my turn. It was here that luck was certainly with me as it turned out the last instructor to speak, Khun Dtoey, had not only studied in the United States but also spoke fluent English. He promptly took me under his wing after first asking whether I spoke Thai (of which I do a little, but nowhere near as good as his English!) and how much shooting experience I had had.

The targets are quite large at half a metre in diameter and are designed for 25m/ 50m shooting. However, for this course we were shooting at 15m. I asked as to when another chance might arise should I fail to obtain the required sixty… probably not for another six months was the reply (talk about pressure!).

The magazine was a single-stack type, although I thought the grip larger than that normally found on a 1911. Loading with five rounds, my first shot scored… a (lucky) ten!… but it was during this first target that the gun started to jam and so after shot #6 K.Dtoey asked the owner whether it might be a good idea to change the recoil spring. It was at this point the bell was rung and shooting ceased whilst targets were retrieved and replaced (this is done manually; the gun is placed on the table in front and you are not allowed even to touch it whilst people are on the range. Magazines may be reloaded).

04-shooting stalls-close - Copy

Shooting at 15m for the award; maximum available range 25m to backstop

With a fresh target and a clear range the signal was given to continue. By now, my initial (reasonably good) shots had been replaced by two fliers caused, as K.Dtoey explained, partly by me not gripping the pistol correctly, but mainly because I was not making an uninterrupted trigger pull accompanied by the “surprise” shot (ie. I was “snatching” the trigger, perhaps trying to react to the recoil before the gun was fired, pulling it low and left). Even though I had done a little extra shooting using my KJW 1911 in the garden, even to the extent of wearing ear protection in an attempt to familiarise myself with shooting conditions at a cartridge shooting range, 6mm CO2 is not quite the same as .45 ACP!

05 KJW Practice - Copy

Practicing at home: KJ Works 6mm CO2 1911A1 from Suphanburi “BB Gunzone”… and hearing protection all the way from Helston Gunsmiths!

Following his advice and placing my left hand slightly further forward than I was used to (I am right handed) and with thumbs parallel instead of crossed, I sighted the gun and slowly squeezed off the next few shots, trying my best to ignore the impending recoil which of course only comes into play once the bullet has left the barrel. This resulted in eight shots placed a little high, but with a grouping centre to center of about 70mm… and a score meaning a badge would be mine (big grins!).

There was still one more target to shoot and although the grouping was not so good it resulted in a higher score of 82 as against to 77. Although I realise many would be able to shoot much better than this (after all, “ratio” wise the 500mm target at 15m is in fact twice the size of the UBC 10m target and a third as big as the scaled target for shooting at 18 feet), I was still very pleased (understatement of the year!) and with practice hope to be able to improve on these scores, especially by placing the impending recoil, which you soon become accustomed to, out of my mind. By now I figured it was time to vacate my place at the range as there were still plenty of people waiting to shoot. Unused ammunition, of which I still had 24 rounds, was returned and a refund given (standard procedure at the club).

06-target and award - Copy

Target #2 – the two “fliers” came before K.Dtoey stepped in! K.Dtoey has represented Thailand several times at international level and is a qualified shooting instructor.

I am very much indebted to K.Dtoey and know for a fact that without his assistance, patience and instruction I would have fared very differently indeed. I would also like to add that along with my attempts at clay shooting in the UK and our trip to the UBC Meet a couple of years ago, this is yet another example of just how knowledgeable, interesting, responsible and above all friendly members of the shooting community are… wherever in the world you may happen to be. Thank you to everyone at “Khao Keaw”.

07 Target03 - Copy

Target #3 complete with car sticker, certificate and badge. In all the excitement, we forgot to take a picture of the gun, but I think the size of the bullet holes speak for themselves (scoring rings are 25mm apart, target shot at 15m).

By AdrianBP


Related pages

Replicas vs firearms

A short history of handguns from 145,991 B.C. to 2260 A.D.

“All you need for a movie is a girl and a gun”

Luc Besson


Leslie Neilson and friends in Forbidden Planet (1956)

Movies and guns, they just seem to go together. Sometimes brilliantly, sometimes hilariously badly. And it’s even better when movie props designers provide us with a vision of handguns of the future (or even the distant past, sort of). Because these often look a lot like the handguns of the present, with random bits of hardware bits stuck on. While most visual elements of movies set in the future seem to get the sort of attention normally associated with brain surgery, handguns are often rather neglected. We get plausibly futuristic costumes, vehicles and cityscapes but law enforcement and military personnel from the future often seem to be stuck with anachronistic handguns.

So, here’s a look at some movie and television visions of the handguns we’ll be using in a few years. They’re presented chronologically, in the order of the dates in which the various movies are set. Not a comprehensive list of sci-fi movies featuring handguns by any means – just a run through some of the more notable ones from the last forty years or so. Not including Forbidden Planet (pictured above) – I just liked the picture. And the futuristic wooden ladder from the 23rd Century. Incidentally some of the details below contain spoilers, especially for Battlestar Galactica.

Where air or airsoft replicas of these pistols exist, I have provided brief details, but I haven’t included details of the many non-shooting replicas which are available.

145,991 B.C.

Battlestar Galactica (TV series, 2004 – 2009)


The Gun: Colonial Warrior Handgun. OK, so now I have ruined the re-booted Battlestar Galactica TV series for anyone who hasn’t seen it and therefore doesn’t know that it is actually set in the distant past. Sorry. But really, you need to keep up…

Anyway, in Series 1 in 2004, the standard sidearm of colonial forces was the Warrior, an electronically fired, magnetic-assisted .36 magnum calibre handgun which fired a 170 grain, steel-cored bullet at close to 1400fps. Due to concerns about the stopping power of the .36 round, the Warrior also featured a single-shot, under-barrel 10mm rocket launcher as back-up.


The Prop: The basis for this gun is a Smith & Wesson 686 revolver, with a small rocket launcher and other bits and pieces added to make it look a bit different. Not a bad looking pistol, though some folk claimed that it was a bit similar to the LAPD pistol used in Blade Runner. During filming it had to be completely dismantled each time it was re-loaded with blanks, so it was discarded in favour of a new pistol based on the FN Five-Seven in Series 2.

Replicas: Off World Manufacturing Co. (really!) made a 6mm, Super Charge Blaster, which is described as a replica of a weapon “used in a popular science fiction TV Series“. OK, we get it. This appears to be a gas powered, mainly plastic revolver with removable shells, but I don’t think it’s still in production and I have never actually seen one. I don’t know how you load the shells either.


Picture from:

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away…

Star Wars: A New Hope (1977)

SWHanBThe Gun: BlasTech Industries DL-44 heavy Blaster pistol. Sidearm of Han Solo, the DL-44 is an particle weapon which fires a pulsed bolt of energy. The DL-44 includes some nice features such as a vibration in the grip when there is only enough power left to fire five more shots and a capacitor which allows this relatively small pistol to fire with extreme power.


The Prop: Based on a Mauser C-96, with additions including several parts from the Revell “Visible V-8 Engine” model kit (for example, the semi-circular bits stuck on the left of the magazine housing are piston halves from that kit) and an M19 azimuth telescope. But still, this is just so cool… Or at least it seemed that way back in 1977.

Replicas: I don’t know of any replicas of the DL-44, but there are a number of 4.5mm and 6mm Mauser C-96 (or M712) replicas around from Marushin, KJW and Umarex. All you need is to find a suitable old Revell model kit, and you can make your own. The picture below shows a fan-made conversion of a Marushin C-96.



Blade Runner (1982)


The Gun: M2019 PKD Detective Special.  Unlike most movie guns, very little is known about the LAPD pistol used by Rik Deckard and his fellow Blade-Runners. Even the name was invented by fans after the movie appeared, standing for Pflager-Katsumata series D Blaster, or PK-D (PKD also being, not entirely un-coincidentally the initials of the author of the story on which Blade Runner is based, Philip K. Dick). However, it appears that in just five years, the LAPD will have switched to some form of energy weapon which is capable of firing at least four shots without reloading. The function of the LEDs and double trigger isn’t known. Beyond looking cool of course. When asked for more information about the pistol in an interview, Harrison Ford famously sighed and answered “Fuck, it’s just a movie…“.


The Prop: The PK-D was constructed by combining the grip and parts of the frame of a Charter Arms .44 Special Police Bulldog revolver with the receiver and trigger from a Steyr Mannlicher .222 Model SL rifle and adding some LED lights. A great looking pistol even if it’s not readily apparent how it would actually work.

Replicas: A company called HWS produced a gas powered, 6mm “snub-nose” version of the M2019 for a while which even included working LEDs. I have never seen one, and these appear to be rarer than a very rare thing. Looks very nice, but it’s crying out for some wood grips.



Robocop (1987)


The Gun: Auto 9 pistol. By 2028, it seems that Law enforcement personnel will have reverted to more conventional handguns. The Auto 9 pistol features an extended compensator, semi, full auto and three-round burst modes and has a handy 50 round magazine. It’s also capable of firing a range of different ammunition types including armour-piercing, flechette, high-explosive and even non-lethal rounds which incapacitate rather than kill (though how different types of round are selected from a single magazine isn’t explained).


The Prop: It’s just a Beretta 93R with an extended fore end and compensator, a large magazine and an oversize rear sight. Not a huge amount of imagination here, though it looks interesting. It must have been difficult to twirl something this big round before re-holstering!

Replicas: KSC used to make a gas blowback 6mm version of the Auto 9. With full and semi-auto modes, a 38 round magazine and a length of almost fifteen inches, this was a large and hefty replica. It’s also a good visual replica of the movie prop, but it has been out of production for many years now. If you find one, grab it.



Avatar (2009)


The Gun: SN-9 WASP Revolver. The SN-9 revolver fires up to six 9mm hypervelocity rounds and includes a gyroscopically stabilised aiming system. It includes mounts for a light and an optical sight with infra-red and movement sensing capabilities. It has no hammer tang, so can only be fired in double action. Unusually for a revolver, it is a select fire weapon with two-round burst mode in addition to semi-auto.


The Prop: This is based on a Ruger GP100 .357 Magnum revolver with additional alloy housings used as a barrel shroud and mounted above and below the barrel to represent the sight and flashlight. Yet another revolver from the future. Sigh.

Replicas: None known.


Aliens (1986)


The gun: H&K VP70 pistol. The polymer framed Heckler and Koch VP70 pistol was a pretty futuristic design when it was released in 1970, but who would have guessed that it would still be in use over 200 years later as the principal sidearm of the Colonial Marines? Mind you, the selection process used by the Colonial Marines for the adoption of new weapons must be almost as complex as that operated by the US Army, given that background information for the movie suggests that they have only recently adopted this pistol in 2179.


The prop: This is just a standard Heckler & Koch VP70. No modifications, no nothing. Which is either a testament to how futuristic it looked in 1986 or a guide to how little effort the props guys put into this one. Or perhaps they had just spent too much time and effort designing the very wonderful M41A Pulse Rifle?

Replicas: LS Works and UHC produced 6mm, gas blowback replicas of the VP70. Both are pretty decent visual replicas (and the UHC version includes a detachable stock) but neither are particularly great shooters and I’m not certain if either is still in production.


LS Works VP70


Star Trek: The Original Series (1966 – 1969)


The Gun: Hand Phaser. By 2260, personnel of the United Federation of planets will be using a directed energy weapon. The Phaser uses plasma, passed through a phaser emitter to produce a directed beam of Nadion particles. The beam can be widened or narrowed by the user and can be set to stun, kill or disintegrate living creatures though it can also be set to perform other useful tasks including cutting through inert material such as metal and rock.


Not many people realise that in addition to “Stun” and “Disintegrate“, the Federation Phaser pistol also has a “Personal Grooming” setting which allows it to be used for the removal of excess nose-hair. Here, an understandably nervous Captain James T. Kirk is about to demonstrate the correct procedure…

The Prop: Now, that’s more like it! The Phaser doesn’t look anything like a conventional firearm, but it’s recognisably a hand-held weapon. And it still looks really cool! How come a television prop from the 1960s manages to do what so many bigger budget productions have failed to manage since?

Replicas: None known. Shame!


Firefly (2002 – 2003)


The Gun: Moses Brothers Self-Defense Engine Frontier Model B. Five hundred years on and handguns will have reverted to a more conventional look. The weapon carried by Captain Malcolm Reynolds in Firefly was also his sidearm during the Unification war. It’s one of a series of handguns produced by Moses Brothers and functions both as a Gauss/Collgun energy weapon and a conventional semi-automatic firearm. It fires Gaus Quadload ammunition powered by a hefty battery inside the grip, but can be switched instantly to fire using a conventional hammer based cartridge system.


The Prop: This is a Taurus Model 85 revolver almost completely covered in a brass casing which makes it look rather different. Despite looking a lot like a revolver, it is claimed to be a semi-auto pistol as well as an energy weapon. The appearance of this pistol deliberately references the Volcanic Repeating pistol used in the US Civil War, supporting the many echoes of the Wild West/Post Civil War America in the series.

Replicas: None known.


So, there you are, almost 150,000 years of handgun development and they’ll still end up looking a lot like elderly revolvers. Probably. Movies provide striking and memorable visions of the future, but when you look at the Hollywood and television vision of handguns of the future (or technically the past, but it’s still basically the future, OK?), the most striking thing is the lack of imagination displayed. Most prop handguns are recognisably existing guns with bits and pieces stuck on to make them look “futuristic“. Han Solo’s iconic blaster pistol may look cool, but it’s still just a Mauser C96 with some bits of an old Revel kit stuck on it. The LAPD pistol in Blade Runner is parts of a rifle and a pistol joined together with no thought as to how it might actually work. The pistol in Aliens is simply an H&K VP70 with no effort to make it look different at all. And how many other movies set in the future have you seen where Glocks, 1911s and versions of the Beretta 92/93 are the main handguns used?

Does this really matter other than to gun nerds? I’d suggest that it does. If you are trying to depict the future, the artefacts and hardware are an intrinsic part of the way in which characters behave and interact. Of all the movie handguns here, only the Phaser from Star Trek and perhaps the WASP revolver from Avatar try to represent something genuinely different. The Phaser doesn’t resemble any existing firearm and with its ability to be used in a non-lethal mode, reflects nicely the ethos of the Federation. The very lethal caseless sabot ammunition proposed in Avatar suggests that someone actually thought about how weapons might have changed in one hundred and forty years time (though I’m still not convinced about burst mode in a revolver). When you look at how handguns have changed even in the last forty years, it does seem likely that in one or two hundred years, pistols may look and function very differently indeed and that may affect how law enforcement and military personnel behave. So, come on guys, if you’re going to show us a handgun from the future, what about a bit of thought and originality?


Please take a moment to complete the Pistol Place survey to let me know what you like (and don’t like) on the site.  Thanks.

Related pages:

The five best gun movies

Replicas in movies and television